Irrigation and Water Engineering

Irrigation and Water Engineering

Impact Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Sediment Yield Changes in Kan Watershed, Tehran Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Watershed Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
2 Department of Watershed Manegement, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari
3 sari university
4 Tarbiat Modares University
10.22125/iwe.2023.403278.1726
Abstract
Watershed management practices by biological, biomechanical and mechanical operations are not only trying to solving watershed problems, but also in line with the sustainable development through improving the economic condition and living standards of stakeholders. Therefore, the present study was conducted to impact evaluation of the soil and water conservation practices on the sediment yield of Kan watershed in Tehran province using the data of the period of 1998-2018. The initial results from the practices simulation using the SWAT model showed that there was the large difference between the simulated and observed values, the model was recalibrated and validated after steps performance of the sensitivity analysis with the 2-SUFI algorithm. Based on the obtained results, the coefficient value of explanation in the calibration and validation stage of model obtained equal to 0.74 and 0.86, respectively, and the Nash-Sutcliffe index value was equal to 0.74 and 0.77, respectively, that these values showed the model had the high efficiency for simulation. Then the simulation of watershed management practices investigated on the watershed level and the results indicated if the management practices implement the sediment values will reduce. In such away that the sediment yield in the watershed reduced using practices simulation of terracing, masonry check dams, gabion check dams, loose stone dams, seeding and planting decreased with rates of 44.65, 26.72, 26.70, 8.03, 4.97 and 9.73 percent, respectively.
Keywords
Subjects

احمدآبادی، ع.، ط. کیانی و پ. غفورپورعنبران. 1396. تحلیل اثرات عملیات آبخیزداری بر روی خصوصیات هیدروژئومورفولوژی حوضه آبریز عنبران چای با استفاده از مدل نیمه توزیعی SWAT. برنامه‎ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی). سال 21، شماره 2، ص 35-55.
احمدی‎افزادی، ح. 1393. بررسی اثر کاربری عملیات آبخیزداری بر هیدرولوژی حوزه‌های آبریز با استفاده از مدل SWAT، مطالعه موردی: حوزه آبریز سد تنگوئیه سیرجان. پایان‎نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان.
آقارضی، ح.، ع.ا، داوودی راد، م. مردیان و ر. بیات. 1395. ارائه الگوی اصلاحی- تکمیلی برنامه‌های آبخیزداری به منظور کاهش رسوب‌دهی در حوزه آبخیز هفتان تفرش. جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، سال 27، شماره 1، ص 187-198.
باقریان کالت، ع.، غ. لشکری پور و م. غفوری. 1400. ارزیابی تأثیر اقدامات آبخیزداری بر پوشش گیاهی و میزان فرسایش و رسوب در حوزة آبخیز کاخک. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، سال 23، شماره 7، ص 51-63.
قویمی‌پناه، م. ح.، ل. غلامی و م.ر. قویمی‌پناه. 1401. برآورد فرسایش خاک با استفاده از مدل RUSLE و تعیین خسارت مستقیم و غیرمستقیم در حوزه آبخیز کن. مجله علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران. سال 16، شماره 56، ص ۴۲-۵۲.
کوهدرزی مقدم، م.، س.م. تقی پور و و. عرفانی پورقاسمی. 1401. اثربخشی اقدامات آبخیزداری در کاهش فرسایش خاک و تولید رسوب (مطالعه موردی: حوزة آبخیز دهلکوه). مدل سازی و مدیریت آب و خاک، سال 2، شماره 4، ص 1-17.
گلزاری س.، ح. زارع ابیانه، م. دلاور و ن. مبرقعی دینان. 1399. بررسی کارایی مدل SWAT در شبیه‌سازی کمی و کیفی رواناب و اقدامات آبخیزداری در حوزه زرینه‌رود. پ‍‍ژوهشنامه مدیریت حوزه آبخیز. سال 11، شماره 12، ص ۱۱۱-۱۲۰.
Abbaspour, K. C. 2011. SWAT-CUP user manual. Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag).‏ 93-105.
Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., Haney, E. B., and Neitsch, S. L. 2012. Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Input/Output Documentation Version 2012. Texas Water Resources Institute. TR-439.‏
Asdak C. 2010. Hidrologi dan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, 5th ed., Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta. 110-122.
Bagherian Kalat, A., Lashkaripour, G. R., and Gafoori, M. 2021. Evaluating the Impacts of Implemented Watershed Management Project on Vegetal Cover and Sediment Yield in Kakhk Watershed Project. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23 (7), 51-63.‏
Brandsma, J., van den Eertwegh, G. A. P. H., Droogers, P., Bai, Z., and Zhang, S. 2013. Green and blue water Resources and management scenarios using the SWAT model for the upper Duhe Basin, China-Feasibility study. Future Water Report.‏ 71pp.
de Oliveira Serrão E A, Silva M T Ferreira T, R, de Ataide LC P, dos Santos C A, de Lima AMM, Gomes DJ C. 2022. Impacts of land use and land cover changes on hydrological processes and sediment yield determined using the SWAT model. International Journal of Sediment Research. 37(1): 54-69.‏
dos Santos, F. M., de Souza Pelinson, N., de Oliveira, R. P., and Di Lollo, J. A. 2023. Using the SWAT model to identify erosion prone areas and to estimate soil loss and sediment transport in Mogi Guaçu River basin in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. CATENA, 222-231.‏
Eiledmi, A., Norri, H., and Falahi, B. 2006. Evaluate the effect of Watershed Management projects to reduce erosion and sedimentation in Magnavy and Gholi Kandi of Hamadan. In The first regional conference exploitation of water resources in Karoun and Zayandehrood basin.‏
Environment Protection Agency. 2012. Identifying and protecting Healthy Watersheds. EPA 841-B-11-002.
Fandel CA. 2016. The effect of gabion construction on infiltration in ephemeral streams. The University of Arizona. 1-20.
Gessesse, B., Bewket, W., and Bräuning, A. 2015. Model‐based characterization and monitoring of runoff and soil erosion in response to land use/land cover changes in the Modjo watershed, Ethiopia. Land degradation & development, 26 (7), 711-724.‏
Gholami, L., Banasik, K., Sadeghi, S. H., Darvishan, A. K., and Hejduk, L. 2014. Effectiveness of straw mulch on infiltration, splash erosion, runoff and sediment in laboratory conditions. Journal of Water and Land Development.‏ 22: 51-60.
Himanshu, S. K., Pandey, A., Yadav, B., and Gupta, A. 2019. Evaluation of best management practices for sediment and nutrient loss control using SWAT model. Soil and Tillage Research, 192, 42-58.‏
Hooshyaripor, F., Yazdi, J., Eftekhari, M., Sheshangosht, S., and Javadi, F. 2016. Flood Management in Kan River Basin Using a Simulation-Optimization Approach. Experimental Research in Civil Engineering. 3 (5), 73-89.‏
Hosseini, S. H., and Khaleghi, M. R. 2020. Application of SWAT model and SWAT-CUP software in simulation and analysis of sediment uncertainty in arid and semi-arid watersheds (case study: The Zoshk–Abardeh watershed). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 6 (4), 2003-2013.‏
Kavian, A., Mohammadi, M., Gholami, L., and Rodrigo-Comino, J. 2018. Assessment of the spatiotemporal effects of land use changes on runoff and nitrate loads in the Talar River. Water, 10(4), 445.‏
Kerr, J. M., Pangare, G., Pangrare, L. V., and George, P. J. 2000. An evaluation of dryland watershed development projects in India (No. 581-2016-39504).‏
Kuti, I. A., and Ewemoje, T. A. 2021. Modelling of sediment yield using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model: a case study of the Chanchaga Watersheds, Nigeria. Scientific African. 13-25.
Setegn, S. G., Dargahi, B., Srinivasan, R., and Melesse, A. M. 2010. Modeling of Sediment Yield from Anjeni‐Gauged Watershed, Ethiopia Using SWAT Model 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46 (3), 514-526.‏
Tesfahunegn, G. B., Vlek, P. L., and Tamene, L. 2012. Management strategies for reducing soil degradation through modeling in a GIS environment in northern Ethiopia catchment. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 92 (3), 255-272.‏
Vigiak, O., Malagó, A., Bouraoui, F., Vanmaercke, M., Obreja, F., Poesen, J. and Grošelj, S. 2017. Modelling sediment fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Science of the Total Environment, 599, 992-1012.‏
Wu, L., Liu, X., Chen, J., Yu, Y., and Ma, X. 2022. Overcoming equifinality: Time-varying analysis of sensitivity and identifiability of SWAT runoff and sediment parameters in an arid and semiarid watershed. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (21), 31631-31645.‏