Investigation of Optimal Hydraulic Cross Section in Two-Section Parabolic Channels

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 water Eng. agriculture faculty of lorestan university

2 Water Eng. Dpartment of Lorestan University

3 Ph.D. Student In Water Structure of Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

10.22125/iwe.2021.128111

Abstract

Among all of the sections that can transport a discharge, the best hydraulic section is to provide the least wetted perimeter. In this study, attempted to find the optimal hydraulic cross section of two stage channel with parabolic cross section and flat width parabolic. Therefore, by constant considering the amount of area and wetted perimeter as the objective function, optimal hydraulic geometrical parameters for two types of channel were obtained and the equations of best hydraulic cross section of each type were extracted. The results show that: Optimal Type 1 model, for the certain discharge, roughness coefficient and bed slope, the least wetted perimeter and as a result, it creates the lowest cost among other sections such as regular hexagonal half, and other types also it's much closer to the wetted perimeter of the semicircular section. Both types of proposed cross-sections also cost much less than optimal cross-sections of previous researches

Keywords

References

      حسین پورمقدم، م. 1392. طراحی بهینه کانال­های مرکب با استفاده از بهینه­سازی غیرخطی. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده فنی مهندسی. دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
شهرادفر، س و فرسادیزاده، د. 1389. طراحی بهینه مقاطع سهمی شکل کانال­های روباز با استفاده از روش الگوریتم ژنتیک. سومین همایش ملی مدیریت شبکه­های آبیاری و زهکشی. اهواز. دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
               
فرزین، س. ، کرمی،ح. ، ولیخان انارکی،م. و احترام، م. 1397. مدل بهینه سازی کانال آبیاری با لحاظ شرایط سیلابی و عدم قطعیت. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی آبیاری و آب ایران، سال نهم، شماره 33، ص 60-46.
Abdulrahman. A.2007. Best hydraulic section of a composite channel, J. Hydraul. Eng. 133:695–697.
Babaeyan Koopaei. K., E. M. Valentine and D. C. Swailes.2000. Optimal design of parabolic-bottomed triangle channels. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 126:408-411.
Bhattacharjya. R. K. and M. G. Satish.2007. Optimal design of a stable trapezoidal channel section using hybrid optimization techniques, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 133:323-329.
Chahar. B. R. 2005. Optimal design of a parabolic channel section, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., (131): 546-554.
Chahar. B. R. 2007. Optimal design of a special class of curvilinear bottomed channel section, J. Hydraulic Eng., (133): 571-576.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open channel hydraulics, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.
Das. A. 2000 .Optimal channel cross section with composite roughness.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 126: 68-72. 
Das. A. 2007. Optimal design of channel having horizontal bottom and parabolic sides, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 133: 192-197.
Easa. S.M. 2009. Improved channel cross section with two-segment parabolic sides and horizontal bottom, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135:357–365.
Han. Y. C.2015. Horizontal bottomed semi-cubic parabolic channel and best hydraulic section, j. Flow. Meas. Instrum., (45): 56–61.
Han. Y.C., X. P. GAO, Xu. Z. H.2017. The best hydraulic section of horizontal-bottomed parabolic channel section, J. Hydrodyn. , (29): 305–313.
Loganathan. G. V .1991. Optimal design of parabolic channels. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 117:716-735. 
Mao. L. and Y. Chen.2019. Two-stage compound channel and best hydraulic section. J. Flow Meas Inst.,<a title="Go to table of contents for this volume/issue" href="https://www.sc

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics