Evaporation Modeling of Free Surface Water Using SVM and LSSVM Models

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Water Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah

2 Assistant Professor of Ghonbad Kavous University, Water Department

3 water engineering, faculty of agriculture, gonbad university, gonbad, Iran

10.22125/iwe.2021.128205

Abstract

Evaporation is one of the most important and influential processes in the water cycle. Evaporation results in the loss of more than half of the precipitation in arid areas. Evaporation pan is used as an indicator for determining the evaporation of lakes and reservoirs due to the ease of interpreting its data around the world. On the other hand, the study on evaporation from the pan and the rate of evapotranspiration of the reference plant shows that there is a linear and direct relation between evaporation from the pan and evapotranspiration of the reference plant. Therefore, by correctly recording the amount of evaporation from the bath, the evapotranspiration of the reference plant can be estimated. ­The empirical relationships presented for estimating evaporation from free surfaces, considering meteorological parameters as inputs, are highly diverse. The accuracy of empirical relationships varies in different regions and needs calibration in each area. Also, it does not have high accuracy and access to all input parameters is difficult or time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of backup vector machine and least squares support vector machine for estimating evaporation from free water level in Golestan province. In this research, three synoptic stations (Kelaleh, Gorgan and Bandar-Turkman) were used for daily weather data for 17 years (1997-2015). The results showed that the input patterns with relative humidity input parameters, maximum relative humidity, wind speed and sunshine hours with the highest R2 and the lowest RMSE and MBE.

Keywords

References

احمدی، ف.، س. آیشم، ک. خلیلی و ج. بهمنش. 1396. ارزیابی عملکرد شبکه عصبی مصنوعی (ANN) و ماشین بردار پشتیبان (SVM) در تخمین مقادیر روزانه تبخیر ) مطالعه موردی: ایستگاه‌های هواشناسی تبریز و مراغه(. نشریه آب‌وخاک (علوم و صنایع کشاورزی)، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی.1(49): 168-151.
اسکندری، ع.، ر. نوری، ح. معراجی و ا. کیا قادری.1391. توسعه مدلی مناسب بر مبنای شبکه عصبی مصنوعی و ماشین بردار پشتیبان برای پیش‌بینی بهنگام اکسیژن خواهی بیوشیمیایی 5 روزه، محیط شناسی.38(61).82-71.
رضایی، ا.، ع. خاشعی سیوکی و شهیدی، ع. 1393. طراحی شبکه پایش سطح آب زیرزمینی با استفاده از مدل حداقل مربعات ماشین بردار پشتیبان (LS-SVM)، تحقیقات آب‌وخاک ایران (علوم کشاورزی ایران).45(4)،389-396.
رضایی، ا.، ع. شهیدی و ع. خاشعی سیوکی. 1392. ارزیابی کارایی مدل حداقل مربعات ماشین بردار پشتیبان در پیش‌بینی سطح ایستابی ) مطالعه موردی: دشت رامهرمز (، نشریه آبیاری و زهکشی ایران.4(7):520-510.
زارع ابیانه، ح.، ح. نوری، ع م. لیاقت، ح. نوری و و ا. کریمی. 1390. مقایسه‌ی روش پنمن مانتیث فائو و تشت تبخیر کلاس A با داده‌های لایسیمتری در برآورد تبخیر و تعرّق گیاه برنج در منطقه‌ی آمل، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی. 43(76): 83-71.‎
شادمانی، م و ص. معروفی.1390. مقایسه چند روش برآورد تبخیر روزانه از تشتک مطالعه موردی منطقه کرمان. مجله علوم -و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، علوم آب‌وخاک. 15 (55):83-69.
شایان نژاد، م. 1385. مقایسه روش‌های شبکه‌های عصبی مصنوعی و پنمن مانتیث در محاسبه تبخیر و تعرق پتانسیل، همایش ملی مدیریت شبکه‌های آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز. 537-531.
Allen, R. G., L. S. Preira., D. Raes and M. Smith, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, NO.56.
Asefa, T., M. W. Kemblowski. M. Mckee and A. Khalil. 2006. Multi-time scale stream flow prediction: The support vector machine approach. Hydrology. 318:7-16.
Asefa, T., M. W. Kemblowski. M. Mckee and A. Khalil. 2004. Support vector-based groundwater head observation networks design. Water Resource Research. 40. W11509.
Behzad, M., K. Asghari M. Eazi and M. Pallhang. 2009. Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling. Expert Systems with Applications. 36: 7624-7629.
Chang F. J., K. Y. Chang and L. C. Chang. 2008. Counter-propagation fuzzyneural network for city flood control system. J. Hydrol. 358: 24-34.
Dibike, Y., S. Velickov, D. Solomatine and M. Abbott. 2001. Model induction with of support vector machines: Introduction and applications, J. Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(3): 208-216.
Eslamian, S. S., J. Abedi-Koupai., M. J. Amiri and S. A. Gohari.2009. Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration using support vector machines and artifical neural networks in greenhouse. Environmental Sciences. 4: 439-447.
Guo, x., x. Sun and x. Ma. 2011. Prediction of daily crop reference evapotranspiration value through a least- square support vector machine model. Hydrology Reserch. 42(4). 268- 274.
Guven, A and Kişi, O. 2011. Daily pan evaporation modeling using linear genetic programming technique, 29 (2):135-145.
Kisi, O. and M. Cimen.2010. Evapotranspiration modelling using support vector machines. Hydrological Sciences.54 (5): 918-928.
Kisi, O. and M. Zounemat-Kermani. 2014. Comparison of Two Different Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems in Modelling Daily Reference Evapotranspiration. Water Resources Management, 28: 2655-2675.
Khemchandani, R., S. Jayadeva and S. Chandra.2009. Regularized least squares fuzzy support vector machine time series forecasting. Expert System with Application. 36: 132-138.
Liong,SY. And C Sivapragasam. 2002. Flood stage forecasting with support vector machines. American Water Resource Association. 38:173-186.
Liu, S., J. Bai., Z. Jia., L. Jia, H. Zhou, and L. Lu. 2010. Estimation of evapotranspiration in the Mu Us Sandland of China. Hydrology and Earth System sciences. 14: 573-584.
Moghadamnia, A., M. Ghafari., J. Piri., and D. Han. 2008. Evaporation estimation using support vector machines technique. Engineering and Technology. 33:14-22.
Pai, P., F. and W. C. Hong. 2007. A recurrent support vector regression model in rainfall forecasting. Hydrological Process. 21:819-827.
Singh, H. and A. Sankarasubramanian.2014. Systematic uncertainty reduction strategies for developing streamflow forecasts utilizing multiple climate models and hydrologic models. Water Resources Research. 50(2): 1288-1307.
Suykens, J. A. K and J. Vandewalle .1999. Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Tezel, G and M. Buyukyildiz. 2015. Monthly evaporation forecasting using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Theoretical and Applied Climatology.
Tezal, G and M. Buyukyildiz, M. 2015. Modeling of daily pan evaportation in subtropical climate ANN LS-SRV fuzzy logic and ANFIS. Thero Appl Climatol.
Valyon, J. and Horvath, G. 2005. A robust LS-SVM regression. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 7:148-153.
Vapnik, V.N. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley. New York.
Wang, L. Kisi, M. Zounemat-Kermani and H. Li. 2016. Pan evaporation modeling using six different heuristic computing methods in different climates of China.
Yu, P. S., S. T. Chen and I. F. Chang. 2006. Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting. Hydrology. 328: 704-716.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics