تحلیل نابرابری اقتصادی،پایداری و مصرف آب در کشورهای عضو همکاری اقتصادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جیرفت، ایران

2 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه جیرفت

3 گروه اقتصاد، ترویج و اموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، واحد علوم ‌و تحقیقات، تهران، تهران

چکیده

باتوجه به اهمیت کمیابی آب، هدف ازانجام این پژوهش، استفاده از مدل اقتصادسنجی برای تعیین سهم نابرابری اقتصادی، پایداری و مصرف آب (QESW) در کشورهای عضو سازمان همکاری اقتصادی می­باشد. از نظر مقایسه کشورها بر اساس ضریب ارزش افزوده به تولیدناخالص داخلی و کارایی استفاده از آب در بخش­های صنعت، کشاورزی و خدمات،کشور آذربایجان با بالاترین ضریب ارزش افزوده به تولیدناخالص داخلی در بخش صنعت، جزء کشورهای با ضریب بالای کارایی استفاده از آب در بخش صنعت است. همچنین، در حالی­که در کشور افغانستان ضریب ارزش افزوده به تولیدناخالص داخلی در بخش کشاورزی بالا بوده، این کشور از منظر ضریب کارایی استفاده از آب در بخش کشاورزی افغانستان، جزء کشورهای با ضریب بالا بوده است. کشور آذربایجان با بالاترین ضریب ارزش افزوده به تولیدناخالص داخلی در بخش خدمات، جزء کشورهای با ضریب بالای کارایی استفاده از آب در بخش خدمات بوده است. بنابر آنچه ذکر شد،  با استفاده از تحلیل  نابرابری اقتصادی، پایداری و مصرف آب در کشورهای عضو سازمان همکاری اقتصادی، سیاستگزاران در خصوص کمیابی و بحران آب می­توانند راهکارهایی جهت مدیریت بهتر منابع آب اتخاذ نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Economic, Sustainability Inequality and Water Consumption in Between Members of Economic Cooperation Organization

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Naghavi 1
  • Hajar esnaashari 2
  • Neda Baniasadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Iran
3 PhD student, Department of Economics, Extension and Agricultural Education, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Considering the importance of water scarcity, the purpose of this research is to use the econometric model to determine the share of economic inequality, sustainability and water consumption (QESW) in Between Members of Economic Cooperation Organization. In terms of comparison of countries based on the added value to gross domestic production and the efficiency of water use in the industry, agriculture and service sectors, the country of Azerbaijan with the highest coefficient of added value to gross domestic production in the industry sector is one of the countries with a high coefficient of water use efficiency. It is in the industry sector. Also, while the coefficient of added value to gross domestic production in the agricultural sector was high in Afghanistan, this country was one of the countries with a high coefficient in terms of the efficiency of water use in the agricultural sector of Afghanistan. Azerbaijan has been one of the countries with the highest coefficient of water use efficiency in the service sector with the highest coefficient of added value to gross domestic production in the service sector. According to what was mentioned, using the QESW analysis policy makers can adopt strategies for better management of water resources regarding water scarcity and crisis.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • QESV Analysis
  • Water Scarcity
  • Economic Growth
خیابانی، ناصر، باقری، سروش، بشیری پور، امیر. (1396). الزامات اقتصادی مدیریت منابع آب، مجله آب و فاضلاب، 28(1):56-.42
 
Alcamo, J., T. Henrichs, and T. Rösch. 2000.World water in 2025-global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century, Kassel World Water Series, Univ. of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
 AQUASTAT Database. Available online: http://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/maindatabase/ (accessed on 4 February
Biswas, A. 2010 Water for a thirsty urban world. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 147–162. Available from. http://www.thirdworldcentre.org/thirstyurban.pdf.
Duarte, R.; Pinilla, V.; Serrano, A. Looking backward to look forward: Water use and economic growth from a long-term perspective. Appl. Econ. 2014, 46, 212–224.
Durán-Romero, G.; López, A.M.; Beliaeva, T.; Ferasso, M.; Garonne, C.; Jones, P. Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model.2020. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang160, 120246. [CrossRef]
 
Eliasson, J. 2015 the rising pressure of global water shortages. Nature 517 (7532), 6.
Falkenmark, M., J. Lundqvist, and C. Widstrand. 1989, Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches,Nat. Resour. Forum, 13,258-267.
Feng, H.; Debra, T.; Yuanchao, X. Yangtze.2019. Water Risks Hotspots and Growth. China’s Water Risk. 2019. Available online: http://www.chinawaterrisk.org/wp-content/ (accessed on 29 May 2020).
Ferraso, M., Bares, L., Ogachi, D., Blanco, M. (2021). Economic and Sustainability Inequalities and Water Consumption of European Union Countries. Water, 13, 2696, 1-25.
GAO, X.; Wang, K.; Lo, K.; Wen, R.; Mi, X.; Liu, K. and Huang, X.2021. An Evaluation of Coupling Coordination between Rural Development and Water Environment in Northwestern China,Land, 10, 405
Jethoo, A.S.; Poonia, M.P. Water Consumption Pattern of Jaipur City (India). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 2, 152–155.
Jiang, Y.2015. China’s Water Security: Current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environ. Sci. Policy, 54: 106–125.

Kaini, S., Nepal, S., Pradhananga, S., Gardner, T. & Sharma, A. K. 2020a. Representatie general circulation models selection and downscaling of climate data for the transboundary Koshi river basin in China and Nepal.International Journal of Climatology, 40, 4132-4148.

 
 
Kaini, S., Nepal, S., Pradhananga, S., Gardner, T. & Sharma, A. K. 2020b. Impacts of climate change on the flow of the transboundary Koshi River, with implications for local irrigation. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1–26.
Kaur, B., Sidhu, R. S. & Vatta, K. 2010 Optimal crop plans for sustainable water use in Punjab. Agricultural Economics Research Review 23, 273–284.
Ke, W.; Sha, J.; Yan, J.; Zhang, G.; Wu, R. A Multi-Objective Input–Output Linear Model for Water Supply, Economic Growth and Environmental Planning in Resource-Based Cities. Sustainability 2016, 8, 160. [CrossRef]
Langhelle, O., 1999. Sustainable development: exploring the ethics of our common future. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 20, 129–149. Li, J., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Huang, X., 2019. Low-carbon economic development in Central Asia based on LMDI decomposition and comparative decoupling analyses. Journal of Arid Land 11, 513–524.
Li, M., Fu, Q., Singh, V. P., Ma, M. & Liu, X. 2017 an intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective non-linear programming model for sustainable irrigation water allocation under the combination of dry and wet conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 555:80-94.
 
Li, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Shen, M. Decomposing the Decoupling of Water Consumption and Economic Growth in China’s Textile Industry. Sustainability 2017, 9, 412
Lu, H. W., Li, J., Ren, L. X. & Chen, Y. Z. 2018 Optimal groundwater security management policies by control of inexact health risks under dual uncertainty in slope factors. Chemosphere, 198, 161–173.
Lundin, M., Morrison, G.M., 2002. A life cycle assessment-based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water 4, 145–152
 Markantonis, V.; Reynaud, A.; Karabulut, A.; El Hajj, R.; Altinbilek, D.; Awad, I.M.; Bruggeman, A.; Constantianos, V.; Mysiak, J.; Lamaddalena, N.; et al.2019. Can the Implementation of theWater-Energy-Food Nexus Support Economic Growth in the Mediterranean Region? The Current Status and the Way Forward. Front. Environ. Sci, 7, 84.
Ngoran, S.D., Xue, X., and Wesseh, J.K. 2016. Signature of Water Resource Consumption on Sustainable Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan African Countries, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4:114- 122.
 
Paiva, C.A.N.2004. Como Identificar e Mobilizar o Potencial de Desenvolvimento Endógeno de Uma Região; FEE: Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Parrado, R.; Pérez-Blanco, C.D.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.; Gil-García, L.2020. To charge or to cap in agricultural water management. Insights from modular iterative modeling for the assessment of bilateral micro-macro-economic feedback links. Sci. Total Environ, 742, 140526. [CrossRef]
Sophocleous, M. 2004 Global and regional water availability and demand: prospects for the future. Natural Resources Research 13 (2), 61–75.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. 2002 Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.Nature 418, 671–677.
Vörösmarty, C. J., P. Green, J. Salisbury, and R. B. Lammers. 2000, Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth, Science, 28, 284–288.
Wang, Q and Wang, X.2021. Does economic growth help reduce inequality of water consumption? Insight from evolution and drivers of inequality in water consumption in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, 28, 37338–37353.
Wang, Q and Wang, X.2020. Moving to economic growth without water demand growth—A decomposition analysis of decoupling from economic growth and water use in 31 provinces of China. Sci. Total Environ, 726, 138362.
 
Yang, H.; Pfister, S.; Bhaduri, A.2013. Accounting for a scarce resource: Virtual water and water footprint in the global water system.Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain, 5, 599–606.